Our Commitment to Accuracy
UKPoliticsDecoded is committed to providing clear, accurate, and evidence based explainers. When errors occur, we correct them transparently and promptly. All corrections are made directly within the original article, which remains publicly accessible as part of the historical record.
1. Our Approach to Corrections
We do not delete articles except in exceptional circumstances (e.g., legal requirements or serious privacy concerns). Instead, we update them so readers always have access to the most accurate version.
Transparency
All significant corrections are clearly marked and explained
Promptness
Errors are fixed as soon as we become aware of them
Integrity
Articles remain part of the public record with corrections applied in place
2. How We Handle Corrections
2.1 Immediate Updates
If we identify an error, whether factual, typographical, or contextual we update the article as soon as possible.
Corrections may include:
- Fixing incorrect data
- Updating outdated information
- Clarifying ambiguous wording
- Adding missing context
- Correcting broken or outdated links
All updates are made with the goal of improving accuracy and clarity.
2.2 Correction Notes
When a correction materially changes the meaning or interpretation of a section, we add a correction note at the bottom of the article.
This note includes:
- What was corrected
- When it was corrected
- Why the correction was necessary
Minor edits (e.g., typos, formatting, link fixes) may not receive a formal note unless they affect understanding.
2.3 Version Integrity
Our commitment:
- We do not remove articles or replace them with new versions
- Each explainer remains part of the public archive, with corrections applied in place
This ensures:
3. Types of Corrections
Major Corrections
Significant factual errors that affect the article's meaning
- Incorrect statistics or data
- Misattribution of quotes or policies
- Factual inaccuracies about processes or events
Always receive a correction note
Minor Corrections
Small errors that don't change the article's meaning
- Spelling and grammar errors
- Formatting improvements
- Link updates
May not receive a correction note
Content Updates
Adding new information or context as situations develop
- Policy changes or updates
- Additional context or clarification
- Legislative developments
Noted as "Updated" with date
4. 📧 How to Request a Correction
If you believe an article contains an error, please contact us:
📧 Email: editor@ukpoliticsdecoded.uk
(or use complaints@ukpoliticsdecoded.uk)
Include:
- The article URL
- A description of the issue
- Any supporting evidence or sources
We aim to acknowledge all correction requests within 5 working days and issue a full response within 21 working days.
5. Correction Assessment Process
Request Received
Correction request logged and acknowledged
Evidence Review
We examine the claim against our sources and external evidence
Editorial Decision
Determine whether correction is needed and the appropriate response
Implementation
Make correction, add note if necessary, and update records
Response
Inform the person who requested the correction of our action
6. ⚖️ Our Standards
Our corrections process aligns with:
- Our Editorial Standards
- Our Complaints Policy
- The principles of the IMPRESS Standards Code, particularly Clause 1 (Accuracy)
Source Verification
We maintain internal audit trails for all explainers to ensure every factual claim is traceable to a primary source. This enables us to:
- Quickly verify correction requests
- Identify the source of any error
- Update information when sources are revised
- Maintain accountability for our reporting
7. Public Corrections Register
We maintain an internal register of all significant corrections for:
- Internal quality control
- Regulatory compliance
- Pattern identification and prevention
- Transparency reporting
Readers can view correction notes on individual articles, and significant corrections are available for review upon request.
8. When We Don't Make Corrections
We typically do not make corrections for:
- Disagreements with editorial judgement or interpretation
- Complaints that don't identify a factual error
- Requests to update articles with new developments (unless the original content is now misleading)
- Minor stylistic preferences
However, we will always explain our reasoning if we decline to make a correction.
9. Review and Updates
This corrections policy is reviewed regularly to ensure it remains effective and aligned with:
- The IMPRESS Standards Code
- Best practice in digital journalism
- Reader needs and expectations
- Internal quality control processes
Updates to this policy will be published on this page.